A conceptual introduction to recovery
The notion of recovery has become the focus of a considerable amount of
dialogue and debate between and among various constituencies within the
mental health and addiction communities. Before we talk about how to bring
this vision to reality within the DBH system we thought it important to
clarify these confusions, some of which are due to the fact that the notion
of recovery is in transition, moving gradually from a well-established
vision among people with addictions or mental illnesses to exerting more
influence on behavioral health care providers' service practices.
Being "in recovery" has long been the guiding vision and goal of self-help
within the addiction community. Primarily a force within self-help, this
notion has not played as much of a role historically within the addiction
service provider community, where concepts of treatment and relapse prevention
have been more central. Having a fifty-year history of peaceful, if benign,
co-existence, these two complementary approaches have recently entered
a period of partnership. This partnership offers the potential to promote
a unified vision of recovery among people with addictions that incorporates
the contributions of both natural and formal supports.
On the other hand, the notion of "recovery" has emerged as a dominant
force within mental health just within the last decade. Most recently,
it has taken center stage through its prominent role in both the Surgeon
General's Report on Mental Health and the President's New Freedom Commission
on Mental Health. In its influential Final Report, the Commission strongly
recommended "fundamentally reforming" all of mental health care to be
based on the goal of recovery.
In both of these reports, however-as well as in clinical and rehabilitative
practice-there is considerable ambiguity and lack of clarity about what
is meant by recovery in mental health. As in addiction, much work remains
to be done in mental health in developing a coherent vision of recovery
that can be acceptable (as well as useful) to all involved parties.
Given its multiple and complicated parentage and the diverse groups involved,
it is not surprising that it has been difficult to reach consensus on
any one definition, or even on any one list of essential aspects, of the
concept of recovery in behavioral health. For the sake of clarity-as well
as to facilitate future discussions-we propose the following distinction
to guide the development, monitoring, and evaluation of clinical and rehabilitative
services and supports offered within a recovery-oriented system of behavioral
health care. These two concepts are intended to be somewhat overlapping
and complementary. The eventual goal is to join them into a unified vision
that can be promoted equally by people in recovery, their loved ones,
behavioral health care providers, and the community at large.